Greater Huntsville Section

 View Only

Feedback Request: Electric-Propulsion GEO Stationkeeping Analysis

  • 1.  Feedback Request: Electric-Propulsion GEO Stationkeeping Analysis

    Posted 4 hours ago
    I recently uploaded a personal astrodynamics project report on electric-propulsion East-West and North-South stationkeeping for a geostationary spacecraft at the 75°W longitude slot.
     
    The project combines MATLAB analysis with GMAT representative full-perturbation cases. The final estimate is a semi-empirical 15-year stationkeeping campaign with total delta-v, usable propellant, initial wet mass, cumulative burn time, and East-West/North-South budget split.
     
    Main assumptions:
    - Dry mass: 2000 kg
    - Electric propulsion thrust: 0.235 N
    - Specific impulse: 4100 s
    - Longitude deadband: ±0.1°
    - Latitude deadband: ±0.05°
     
    Main result:
    - Total 15-year stationkeeping delta-v: 978.96 m/s
    - Usable propellant: 49.29 kg
    - Initial wet mass: 2049.29 kg
    - Total EP burn time: 2342.72 hr
    - North-South stationkeeping contribution: approximately 97.3% of total delta-v
     
    The report is intended as a stationkeeping sizing and feasibility analysis, not as a fully automated closed-loop GMAT controller. A future extension would be an event-driven GMAT controller with optimized burn timing, burn magnitudes, and finite-duration electric-propulsion modeling.
     
    I would appreciate feedback from anyone with experience in GEO stationkeeping, low-thrust spacecraft operations, GMAT mission analysis, or flight dynamics operations, especially on the correction-sizing assumptions and the path toward a closed-loop GMAT implementation.
     


    ------------------------------
    Egor Buntush
    The University of Alabama in Huntsville
    Huntsville AL
    (615)484-9927
    ------------------------------